The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed a new rule aiming to create a standardized definition of what it means for a nonbank financial company to pose “risks to consumers.” The goal is to make supervision clearer, more consistent, and limited to significant threats rather than being applied on an ad‑hoc basis.
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has reduced its national loan limits for the first time in over a decade, reshaping the landscape for prospective homebuyers in expensive markets. The change means many borrowers who expected to qualify under former thresholds may now fall short—and could face fewer options.
A 25‑basis‑point cut from the Federal Reserve is widely anticipated, but economists and bond‑market experts caution that the effect on mortgage rates could be limited or even counterintuitive in the near term. Markets are almost certain that the Fed will reduce its short‑term rate target from 4.25‑4.50% by a quarter point.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s decision to swiftly clear nearly all outstanding “matters requiring attention” (MRAs) is raising alarm among mortgage compliance experts, who warn the move could lead to regulatory gaps and unchecked risks. MRAs serve as a critical supervisory tool, flagging compliance issues—ranging from minor documentation oversights to serious lending violations—and giving lenders an opportunity to address them before formal enforcement.
In the second quarter of 2025, real estate investors accounted for a historic share of home purchases as traditional buyers struggled with surmounting affordability challenges. Investors snapped up nearly 27% of all homes sold during this period—an all‑time high over the past five years and a sharp rise from the 18.5% average seen between 2020 and 2023.
Ten years of experience in the real estate industry and last week I went through four contract extensions, a six hour settlement waiting for HUD-1 approval and scrambling around getting documents signed the following day so that the loan wouldn’t be recalled, all for the same transaction!
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
How many times have you suspended or possibly rejected a loan and then listened politely as the processor or loan officer provided a very long dissertation as to why the case should be approved which usually ended with one or both of them stating very strongly, “but it meets guidelines!” Yep me too, lots of times.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
You know, the more I’ve thought about things lately the more I have to admit I was wrong on one thing and I’m sure I’m not the only one in this category. For years we all frowned on having to do all of the extra processing and qualifying steps on VA loans.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Hello Everybody – Hope everyone is staying busy. In my hunt for a topic every week, sometimes it is easy and other times, I haven’t a clue what I will write about until the last minute. This week was one of those last minute thoughts – so I hope this blog is helpful.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
I received some pretty interesting news from one of my primary investor for 203k’s this week. It was regarding allowable fees on both streamline and standard 203k’s. Much to my surprise it was regarding what we could not charge which was somewhat of a surprise considering HUD’s removal of the cap on origination fees this year per ML 2009-53 as well as doing away with most of the non allowable closing cost per ML2006-4.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
I had to do some research last week to help a top producer put together presentation materials for a first time homebuyer workshop and I was reminded of how under-used and under-appreciated these valuable resources really are.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
That’s correct, it appears that documentation waivers are slowly beginning to disappear and I don’t mean by exercising due diligence, I mean they are less and less present on AUS findings. Now, I am sure that a lot of you are thinking that I have lost my mind but if you take a good look at your findings you will see what I am talking about, particularly on cases where the credit score is less than 700.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Hello Everybody - While I was thinking of a topic for this week’s blog, I could not dismiss in my mind the news reports of how many foreclosed homes are being sold at rock bottom prices. I think it is an absolute tragedy that so many people are losing their homes.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
As we all dealt with back in March, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is set to expire yet again at midnight on May 31st. With a holiday weekend looming, it’s somewhat doubtful congress will have this resolved by the forthcoming expiration date.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
On May 11th, USDA announced that they would continue to issue Conditional Commitments for Guaranteed Rural Housing loans until even after 2010 appropriated funds has been exhausted. Their bulletin stated that such Conditional Commitments would be issued with a condition stating “subject to the availability of funds and Congressional authority to charge a 3.5 percent guarantee fee for purchase loans and a 2.25 percent guarantee fee for refinance loans.”
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.