President Donald Trump’s recent push for the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates has stirred considerable debate among economists and financial analysts. While the intention behind such a move is to stimulate economic growth, experts caution that a politically driven rate cut may not deliver the anticipated benefits for consumers—particularly when it comes to mortgage rates—and could even trigger unintended consequences.
As mortgage rates continue to fluctuate in 2025, homeowners and prospective buyers are faced with an increasingly complex decision: whether to choose a fixed-rate or tracker mortgage. With economic conditions shifting rapidly and borrowing costs remaining unpredictable, understanding the differences between these two loan types is more important than ever.
CBRE Group Inc. reported a solid start to 2025, exceeding Wall Street’s revenue expectations for the first quarter and signaling resilience amid ongoing commercial real estate headwinds. The global property services firm posted a 12.3% year-over-year increase in revenue, reaching $8.91 billion—a figure that reflects strength in its diverse operations even as broader market sentiment remains cautious.
Economists are raising red flags over former President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policy, warning that the reintroduction of steep tariffs could undo decades of global economic integration and steer the U.S. economy back toward the protectionist practices of the early 20th century. Recent estimates suggest that average U.S. tariff levels are now approaching highs not seen since 1910—a period marked by isolationism and economic volatility.
Zillow has announced a sweeping policy shift that aims to clamp down on the widespread use of “pocket listings”—properties marketed privately without being listed on a Multiple Listing Service (MLS). Starting May 1, homes that have been publicly marketed outside the MLS will no longer be allowed on Zillow’s platform. The move is being positioned as a step toward greater transparency and equal opportunity in home buying.
Effective September 1, 2014, USDA will replace the 7 CFR 1980-D regulations with the 7 CFR 3555 regulations for its guaranteed rural housing program. The new handbook will house all previous administrative notices (AN’s) and the existing rules in one comprehensive document. The new handbook will also include all rule changes based on regulation 7 CFR 3555.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Are you aware that there is a zero down program available? And no, it isn’t VA. The USDA offers the Rural Housing Loan Program that is available to mid and low income persons in rural area.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
On May 11th, USDA announced that they would continue to issue Conditional Commitments for Guaranteed Rural Housing loans until even after 2010 appropriated funds has been exhausted. Their bulletin stated that such Conditional Commitments would be issued with a condition stating “subject to the availability of funds and Congressional authority to charge a 3.5 percent guarantee fee for purchase loans and a 2.25 percent guarantee fee for refinance loans.”
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.