In the second quarter of 2025, real estate investors accounted for a historic share of home purchases as traditional buyers struggled with surmounting affordability challenges. Investors snapped up nearly 27% of all homes sold during this period—an all‑time high over the past five years and a sharp rise from the 18.5% average seen between 2020 and 2023.
As September unfolds, anticipation is building around the Federal Reserve’s likely decision to implement its first rate cut of 2025. The expected 25-basis-point reduction would bring the federal funds rate down to a target range of 4.00%–4.25%. But despite the headlines, homebuyers shouldn’t expect mortgage rates to fall dramatically in response.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has announced a sweeping new policy requiring that all agency business be conducted solely in English. The directive follows an executive order signed by President Trump earlier this year declaring English the official language of the United States.
Fannie Mae has scaled back its housing and mortgage market projections, issuing a more conservative outlook in its latest Economic & Housing Forecast. The update reflects a recognition that elevated interest rates, affordability constraints, and slowing economic momentum are likely to weigh on both home sales and price growth through the remainder of 2025 and into 2026.
U.S. housing starts surged unexpectedly in July, rising 5.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.428 million units—a five‑month high and 12.9% above the same month last year. The surge was driven primarily by a jump in multifamily construction.
I’ve told a horror story or two about some of my customer’s experiences with lenders. The reason we have horror stories is because most people have no idea how to choose a lender. Most use origination points and interest rate as criteria for making their choice but this doesn’t reflect a lender’s ability to close a loan smoothly, with finesse and good customer service.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
If there is one thing most production staff will unanimously agree on, it would be that loan originators never collect sufficient documentation when originating a loan. Forget the compliance errors, never signing and dating the initial 1003 or even having the borrower do it, it just seems that loan officers are so busy selling the deal that they sometimes neglect to collect or even request the information that processors need to get the deal into underwriting.
sometimes neglect to collect or even request the information that processors need to get the deal into underwriting.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In a recent meeting of the minds we determined that our closing and funding departments have been seeing an increasing number of doc correction requirements come through in regards to PUD properties. So we posed the question- What makes a PUD a real PUD? What should we refer to as our determining factor on a potential PUD property?
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Economic times are difficult. Home sales are down. There are many sellers and few buyers. In fact, when you discuss the opportunities for home ownership, most just shake their heads and say they doubt they’ll qualify. We live in the land of opportunity and the American Dream is becoming a nightmare.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Over the past year or so we have all implemented policies concerning the Home Valuation Code of Conduct which the agencies implemented in April, 2009 with the Federal Housing Administration following suit shortly after.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
I had a closing about a month ago on a Friday morning. We didn’t leave the title company until 6 hours later! We sat six hours at the settlement table waiting for settlement sheet adjustments to be approved. What can take six hours? I can write out bills, make deposits, clean my kitchen, hit the yard sales, get my hair done and walk my dog in less than six hours.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In the past before the market changed, it was common practice to list retirement funds on the 1003 at either 70% of the vested account value for conventional loans or 60% of the vested value if a government loan. As long as the borrower wasn’t utilizing the account funds for their downpayment or closing costs, we didn’t need to document the terms of withdrawal. However, dependent upon the type of retirement account in question, we may need documentation in our file justifying the amount of funds listed for reserve.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Recently, I have noticed that there are few misconceptions about how we underwriters go about determining if a borrower is qualified for the mortgage for which they have applied. Now I know there are several loan officers, not to mention realtors who would swear that we underwriters rely solely on our psychic abilities to determine if a borrower is approvable and I’m sure that a lot of the processing staff would also agree that we are proficient at this sort of thing, I base this assumption on the quality of file we usually get from an underwriting standpoint, by this I mean no employment information filled in on the 1003
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
I read Bonnie’s blog from Monday and just burst out laughing. Bonnie and I have been friends for about six years and have spent many a night sitting across the table with a beer, discussing the mortgage industry. She was an underwriter and then, I was a loan officer.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Definition: Proposed Construction These are properties pre-approved for mortgage insurance prior to the beginning of construction, defined as the first placement of concrete or other permanent materials.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.