The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed a new rule aiming to create a standardized definition of what it means for a nonbank financial company to pose “risks to consumers.” The goal is to make supervision clearer, more consistent, and limited to significant threats rather than being applied on an ad‑hoc basis.
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has reduced its national loan limits for the first time in over a decade, reshaping the landscape for prospective homebuyers in expensive markets. The change means many borrowers who expected to qualify under former thresholds may now fall short—and could face fewer options.
A 25‑basis‑point cut from the Federal Reserve is widely anticipated, but economists and bond‑market experts caution that the effect on mortgage rates could be limited or even counterintuitive in the near term. Markets are almost certain that the Fed will reduce its short‑term rate target from 4.25‑4.50% by a quarter point.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s decision to swiftly clear nearly all outstanding “matters requiring attention” (MRAs) is raising alarm among mortgage compliance experts, who warn the move could lead to regulatory gaps and unchecked risks. MRAs serve as a critical supervisory tool, flagging compliance issues—ranging from minor documentation oversights to serious lending violations—and giving lenders an opportunity to address them before formal enforcement.
In the second quarter of 2025, real estate investors accounted for a historic share of home purchases as traditional buyers struggled with surmounting affordability challenges. Investors snapped up nearly 27% of all homes sold during this period—an all‑time high over the past five years and a sharp rise from the 18.5% average seen between 2020 and 2023.
Fannie Mae economists say recent data points to a stronger economy than previously expected, but a downturn is still imminent. Regardless of whether the economy enters a recession, the Fannie said in its August commentary that home sales are expected to remain subdued.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
A record percentage of survey respondents believe it’s a bad time to buy a home at a time when home prices have reached all-time highs in 30 of the 50 largest markets. In the latest Fannie Mae Home Purchase Sentiment Index® (HPSI), 82 percent of consumers reported that it’s a bad time to buy a home, a new survey high and up from 78 percent the previous month.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
The Community Home Lenders of America (CHLA) wants to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to alter its previously announced implementation schedule for changes in the credit score reporting process. In a letter sent last week to FHFA, CHLA urged the regulatory agency to begin with process using only VantageScore, while deferring use of FICO 10T to a later phase.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Members of Congress and mortgage industry leaders have spent the past year attempting to eliminate trigger leads. Trigger leads occur when credit bureaus sell a potential borrower’s information after a credit application “triggers” a credit report pull. The credit bureaus can sell the lead to data brokers and other lenders without the consumer’s knowledge or approval.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Mortgage underwriters and processors who are interested can keep themselves busy for a while studying a pair of recently released sets of data. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) released data on 2022 mortgage lending transactions reported under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). The data was compiled from records by 4,460 U.S. financial institutions, including banks, savings associations, credit unions, and mortgage companies.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
A housing shortage for potential middle income buyers and decreasing optimism from all potential buyers is contributing to fewer purchase originations for mortgage processors and underwriters. But there’s potential good news in that the next generation of potential homeowners remains interested in ownership.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Mortgage underwriters and processors have been dealing with fewer originations with higher home values, according to several sources of industry data. U.S. house prices rose 4.3 percent between the first quarters of last year and this year, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) House Price Index.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) officially issued a Request for Input (RFI) on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s (the Enterprises) single-family pricing framework just a few days after rescinding a key upfront fee set to take effect August 1. The agency said the aim of the RFI is to solicit public feedback “on the goals and policy priorities that FHFA should pursue in its oversight of the pricing framework.”
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac delivered lower year-over-year financial results in the first quarter of 2023 in what both companies termed a “volatile” and “uncertain” market. The two enterprises released their quarterly results last week.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) wants to codify many of its existing practices and programs to better ensure fair housing and lending oversight of its regulated entities. In a notice of proposed rule making released last week, FHFA is seeking comments on its proposal to codify into regulation.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.