In the second quarter of 2025, real estate investors accounted for a historic share of home purchases as traditional buyers struggled with surmounting affordability challenges. Investors snapped up nearly 27% of all homes sold during this period—an all‑time high over the past five years and a sharp rise from the 18.5% average seen between 2020 and 2023.
As September unfolds, anticipation is building around the Federal Reserve’s likely decision to implement its first rate cut of 2025. The expected 25-basis-point reduction would bring the federal funds rate down to a target range of 4.00%–4.25%. But despite the headlines, homebuyers shouldn’t expect mortgage rates to fall dramatically in response.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has announced a sweeping new policy requiring that all agency business be conducted solely in English. The directive follows an executive order signed by President Trump earlier this year declaring English the official language of the United States.
Fannie Mae has scaled back its housing and mortgage market projections, issuing a more conservative outlook in its latest Economic & Housing Forecast. The update reflects a recognition that elevated interest rates, affordability constraints, and slowing economic momentum are likely to weigh on both home sales and price growth through the remainder of 2025 and into 2026.
U.S. housing starts surged unexpectedly in July, rising 5.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.428 million units—a five‑month high and 12.9% above the same month last year. The surge was driven primarily by a jump in multifamily construction.
What impact will President Donald Trump have on mortgage processors and underwriters over the next four years or more? The answers may be as unpredictable as his campaign and as surprising as his victory on Election Day...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In December 2014, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update regarding the required methods for analyzing self-employed borrowers whose income is reported on Schedule K-1 for S-corporations or Partnerships. In August 2015, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update that delayed the implementation of these new rules until February 2016. On June 28, 2016 Fannie Mae issued another update which clarified some of the policies outlined in the original selling guide update from 2014. As a result, it is now mandatory that all lenders begin to analyze self-employed income utilizing these new rules.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
As mentioned briefly within prior articles, Fannie Mae has been implementing various components of the Loan Quality Initiative since April. One of the most recently implemented components added a requirement for interested parties to be run against HUD’s Limited Denial of Participation (LDP) and Excluded Parties Listing Service (EPLS) list.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
If you want to get credit policy people like me all fired up, here’s the topic to drop in passing. Fannie Mae’s Loan Quality Initiative has gotten so much press and has stirred up so much controversy it’s ridiculous.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.