The major mortgage backers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have recently curtailed publication of several of their longstanding public housing-market surveys and economic forecasts. This marks a sharp shift away from a history of openly sharing data that many lenders, analysts, and policymakers have relied on to gauge market sentiment and make informed decisions.
Several of the largest U.S. real estate platforms are predicting that mortgage rates will see minimal movement in 2026, maintaining a pattern of stability rather than dramatic shifts. Despite hopes for a significant drop, most forecasts suggest rates will remain anchored in the low-6% range throughout the year.
As mortgage rates have dipped recently, refinancing activity has surged — and servicers are holding onto more of those refinanced loans than at any time in the past three and a half years. According to Q3 2025 data from ICE Mortgage Technology, refinance-loan retention rose to 28%, the highest figure recorded since early 2022.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has announced that the baseline conforming loan limit (CLL) for one-unit properties will increase to $832,750 in 2026, up from $806,500 in 2025. This adjustment reflects the annual rise in U.S. home prices. The increase is mandated by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA), which requires that the loan limits be recalculated each year based on the change in the national average home price.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has announced that the loan‑purchase cap for multifamily mortgages for each of its regulated entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — will be $88 billion in 2026, marking a combined cap of $176 billion for both enterprises. This represents a significant increase from 2025, when the cap for each entity was set at $73 billion (combined $146 billion). The increase is more than 20 percent year‑over‑year.
What impact will President Donald Trump have on mortgage processors and underwriters over the next four years or more? The answers may be as unpredictable as his campaign and as surprising as his victory on Election Day...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In December 2014, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update regarding the required methods for analyzing self-employed borrowers whose income is reported on Schedule K-1 for S-corporations or Partnerships. In August 2015, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update that delayed the implementation of these new rules until February 2016. On June 28, 2016 Fannie Mae issued another update which clarified some of the policies outlined in the original selling guide update from 2014. As a result, it is now mandatory that all lenders begin to analyze self-employed income utilizing these new rules.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
As mentioned briefly within prior articles, Fannie Mae has been implementing various components of the Loan Quality Initiative since April. One of the most recently implemented components added a requirement for interested parties to be run against HUD’s Limited Denial of Participation (LDP) and Excluded Parties Listing Service (EPLS) list.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
If you want to get credit policy people like me all fired up, here’s the topic to drop in passing. Fannie Mae’s Loan Quality Initiative has gotten so much press and has stirred up so much controversy it’s ridiculous.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.